This is the ultimate comparison guide between Canon M50 Mark II and Canon M6 Mark 11.
Compared side-by-side, the two models are similar in many ways, but there are several significant differences.
In particular, the 200D offers more features and improved performance, including an electronic viewfinder, faster burst, and more frequent shooting, a silent mode, and an intervalometer.
The two cameras are also about 15% lighter and feature many other improvements, such as the ability to use many non-native lenses.
Eye Detection AF vs Canon 200d mark ii
When comparing the performance of the eye-detecting autofocus (AF) on a Canon camera to a rival model, the M50 mark II comes out ahead.
Eye-detecting AF, which is included in the Canon M50, adds another AF point to face detection.
Rather than focusing on the whole face, this feature selects the eye of the subject and displays it on the camera’s screen as a smaller AF point within the larger face detection AF point.
Eye-detecting AF is an advanced feature, which is a great addition to the camera’s AF system.
It works even when the subject is further away and is also compatible with AI Servo AF, which locks focus on moving subjects. Movie Servo AF is a great example of this feature in action.
Another notable improvement is the inclusion of video snapshots. The video snapshot mode captures one second’s worth of footage in FHD mode at the start of recording and later combines the video snapshots into an album.
The album is then played back with background music. The playback options on the M50 mark II are similar to those of the 200D. Both cameras have buttons for manual focusing, but the new M50 mark II has a touch screen to control the video recording mode.
The M50 mark ii has an excellent user interface, but the M50 does not have a traditional three-dial layout.
Instead, you have to toggle the top-bar menu to find the relevant section, and then touch an icon to open the page. While the M50 mark ii is a capable camera, you’ll likely find that it is more difficult to use than the 200d.
When it comes to noise, the M50 delivers better results when compared to the 80D.
The Canon M50 uses 24 MP APS-C sensors, which are notoriously noisy. If you’re comfortable with ISO 3200, the M50 will be fine. ISO 6400 and ISO 12800 are noisy and have limited use. ISO 51200 is quite high, though, and is primarily used for low-light shooting and isn’t very usable for other purposes.
Sensor size vs Canon 200d mark ii
The main difference between the Canon 200D and the 5D Mark II lies in the size of the sensors. The sensor on the 200D is APS-C, whereas the 5D Mark II uses a full-frame sensor.
The cameras use a similar chipet, although the 200D’s is more advanced. As a result, the camera’s sensor offers better noise reduction.
If you’re shooting portraits, the Canon 200D is the right choice for you. It offers high-quality portraits and video and features such as forward-directional audio recording.
The camera is also compatible with a wide variety of lenses, including the Canon SL3 and the new SL3.
But what about videography? While both cameras offer a great live view, you may find the latter’s EVF to be a bit dated and not as impressive as the former.
The camera is slightly smaller than the original but still very compact and lightweight. The APS-C sensor on the Mark II has a bigger area for the AF sensors.
The video-recording capability of the Mark II is also better, though its resolution is not much more than the 200D’s. But the main difference between the two cameras lies in the size of the sensor. The 200D Mark II’s sensor has a much larger area for capturing video.
The 2D Mark II features a 1.6x bigger sensor compared to the Canon SL2. The latter has a weather-sealed body and is better suited for shooting in bad weather conditions.
It has a larger sensor area compared to the Canon SL2 and the Canon 1D MII N. Moreover, the SL2 has a smaller APS-C sensor.
Optical zoom vs Canon 200d mark ii
The Canon EOS 200D Mark II and its predecessor, the EOS 200D, are among the most popular DSLR cameras for beginners and intermediate photographers.
While the features of these cameras are largely the same, the Mark II’s improved sensor and DIGIC 8 processor make it a better camera overall. In addition, the camera is capable of 4K video recording. This makes it ideal for both amateur and professional photographers.
The two cameras offer everything that a digital SLR should have and the Canon EOS 200d Mark II has a lower price to match. In terms of AF points, the Canon has a higher number of AF points than the Nikon D5600 but loses Dual Pixel technology.
Besides, the D5600 has an optical zoom that is twice as strong. However, both cameras feature dual pixel autofocus systems and optical image stabilization.
These features make the camera more stable and reduce the effects of camera shake.
Using a digital camera with an optical viewfinder will give you the advantage of framing your subject in bright light.
This feature is also useful when using a tripod or in low-light conditions. With a viewfinder, you can also see the size of the picture you’ve taken.
The Canon 200D is slightly larger, with a maximum resolution of 30 x 20 inches (76.8 x 50.8 cm) and a maximum print size of 24 x 16 inches (61 x 40.6 cm). Both cameras are capable of excellent output quality.
While the features and performance of these two cameras may seem similar, there are some notable differences between them. The Canon 200D Mark II is much more affordable.
The latter features a top-level LCD, which can convey essential shooting information and make it easier to verify settings.
The latter’s screen also rotates to the front-facing position, which is a boon for photographers and vloggers.
The Canon EOS 200D Mark II features a variety of new features. These include HDR art standard, vivid, bold, and embossed, and customizable filters. Its autofocus system is still a CMOS and is very similar to the Canon 200D’s.
Both cameras support RAW and JPEG and can upload pictures to a cloud service. The EOS 200D mark II is also a bit heavier than the Canon 200D.
AF system vs Canon 200d mark ii
Canon EOS 200D versus Canon M6 Mark II: which is better? This comparison is based on a similar set of specifications and features.
Both cameras feature APS-C sensors and features live view focus. The biggest difference between the two cameras is the resolution. The Canon 200D has a resolution of 24 megapixels, while the M6 Mark II has a resolution of 32.3 megapixels.
The Canon 200D and M6 Mark II cameras feature similar controls, features, and AF systems. The cameras are also almost identical in terms of size, weight, and design.
While the two cameras feature similar features, the 200D has some added features. The EOS 600D has a new Smooth Skin mode. This mode offers five levels of skin smoothness adjustment.
The dual pixel AF system is not new, but Eye Detection AF should improve portraiture performance.
The EOS 600D also maintains the same through-the-viewfinder AF system but offers only 95% frame coverage. The AF system is less appealing than a modern EVF, but that’s to be expected.
In terms of image quality, the Canon 200D produces excellent photos straight from the camera. Although the camera has a few shortcomings when it comes to autofocus in live view, it has plenty of sharpness and a well-balanced color palette.
Both cameras also have accurate exposure metering, which is a big selling point for many photographers. You can easily find a better camera at a local electronics store and compare AF systems between the two.
The Canon M6 Mark II offers a built-in intervalometer, which makes it easy to capture time-lapse sequences.
The Canon 200D supports both SDXC and UHS-II cards. Both cameras write their files to SDXC memory cards, and the Canon 200D supports both. If you are considering buying a new camera, it’s worth checking out the M6 Mark II and the Canon 200D.
Conclusion
The main difference between these two cameras comes in autofocus performance. The 200D mark II has a more complex AF system than the Canon EOS 7D.
The former has a high-speed continuous AF system that isn’t great for moving subjects, but it’s very useful for still-life photography.
Similarly, the Canon EOS 7D offers a faster frame-rate and Wi-Fi.
