If you’re looking for a cheaper Sony A6400 alternative, look no further.
This article will compare the features of the Fuji X-T30, Canon EOS M50, and Sony a6400.
Find out what they’re like and which one would be a better fit for your needs.
Also, read about the camera’s autofocus system. If you love the Sony a6400’s autofocus, it’s an excellent choice for a family camera.
1. Fuji X-T30
The Fujifilm X-T30 is the perfect alternative to the Sony A6400 for many reasons. Its two-way tilting screen is large and comfortable to hold in your hands.
While it lacks the one-touch Movie Record button, it does have built-in wi-fi and Bluetooth.
You can use the camera’s 2.4Ghz wi-fi connection to control it from a computer or smartphone. You can even use the app to transfer images to your phone.
The Fuji X-T30 II is a more recent model that followed the X-T30. Both cameras use the same sensor, which is a good thing, especially for videography.
The X-T30 has better low-light performance, a larger battery, and a more compact design than the A6400. The camera also lacks anti-alias filter and lacks an external HDMI recorder.
The X-T30 II also offers more control. The rear control panel has three dials – AE-L, Play, and Menu.
Despite having three dials on the top, the X-T30 II also has an on-screen overlay menu. The Q menu offers customizable shortcuts to several camera functions.
The default settings are for 12 functions, including ISO, AF, face detection, and screen brightness. The Q menu is navigable using the rear controls, as well as by touching the screen.
The Fuji X-T30 has the same 26.1-megapixel APS-C sensor as the Sony A6400. It has a tethering port, which means you can connect it to a smartphone. While the Sony A6400 has a longer battery life, the Fuji X-T30 is the better choice for travel and vloggers.
The Sony A6400 offers a USB port and an SD card slot, but the X-T30 has more flexibility when it comes to connectivity.
As a pro user, you might find the Sony A6400 more useful than the Fuji X-T30. Its 4K video capability and 180-degree flip-forward screen make it great for vlogging. But its overall design makes it less appealing to still photographers.
The X-T30 also features a larger battery than the Sony A6400. Its 10 minutes of 4K video recording is not as impressive as the Sony A6400’s, but it has other features that are worth considering.
Aside from its lower price, the Fujifilm X-T30 is also very similar to the Sony A6400. It shares the same sensor as Sony’s flagship camera and produces the same image quality.
And its price is significantly cheaper than Sony’s A6400. The X-T30 is also available with a zoom lens, though the X-T30’s zoom range is significantly less.
As a Fujifilm X-T30 alternative to the Sony A6400, the X-T30 is capable of capturing photos with a higher keeper rate.
The camera uses back-illuminated technology. Fujifilm X-Trans sensors ensure the presence of red, blue and green channels on every line. Sony A6400’s standard Bayer sensor is prone to “watercolour” artefacts. Luckily, both Fuji and Sony cameras have a number of improvements in the software.
2. Canon EOS M50
Despite their similarity in size, the Sony A6400 and Canon EOS M50 have some fundamental differences that separate them. While both cameras have a 1.0-inch sensor, the Sony has a larger sensor.
This means that its pixels are larger, and the EVF is located inside a small protrusion on the top of the camera. While the viewfinders of both cameras are similar in size, the Canon’s protrusion on the top adds some height to the camera.
Both cameras offer an integral flash unit and can tilt and fold out. But while the Sony has a slightly better touchscreen and higher dot count, the Canon’s viewfinder offers more customization options. Its rear LCD has 1.04 million dots versus 921,600 for the Sony model.
Both cameras have integral flash units, but the Sony has a higher guide number of six. The price difference isn’t significant.
When it comes to video recording, the Sony A6400 is definitely the better choice for people who want to capture 4K video without using a large crop of the sensor.
The other camera on the market also has an electronic shutter, but the Canon is cheaper and does not have these features.
Nevertheless, if you don’t care about video or want to capture the wildlife on a budget, the Canon EOS M50 is a viable alternative to the Sony A6400.
Moreover, the Canon EOS M50 has a better battery life than the Sony A6400. Both cameras require a recharge after about 235 shots, whereas the Sony A6400 uses flash in 50% of the shots.
Its battery life is also extended by Canon’s Eco mode, which dims the back LCD when the camera is not in use. However, the Sony A6400 has much more advanced autofocus features.
The Canon EOS M50 is not recommended for vloggers who want to shoot in 4K. Its field of view is also cropped. A wide-angle EF-M 11-22mm lens is needed for decent selfie video. During 4K recording, Dual Pixel AF is turned off, which means contrast detection is used for focus, and video can look choppy.
Despite their different size and weight, the two cameras offer similar camera specifications. The Sony A6400 is 21 percent smaller than the Canon M50 and weighs about the same amount.
The two cameras also differ in the way they work with video. The Sony A6400 is more versatile and features a microphone socket. This can be useful if you want to shoot both video and stills.
3. Sony X-T30
A comparison of a Fujifilm X-T30 and a similar-priced Sony A6400 will reveal the key differences between the two cameras. Both cameras offer similar features but the main difference is in the metering system.
The Fujifilm X-T30 has two Black and White profiles while the Sony a6400 only offers one.
The Sony X-T30 adds a yellow or green tint to skin tones, while the Sony a6400 tends to have a more reddish tone. They are similar in their color profiles, but the Sony a6400 is also slightly more versatile.
The X-T30 has excellent autofocus performance and the ability to shoot in 4K at 30 frames per second. It also offers UHD and DCI resolutions.
It also includes Fujifilm’s Eterna film simulation, which is based on the motion picture film. This feature is unique to the X-T30 and can be a huge asset if you’re looking to create film-like videos.
The Sony X-T30 II also features a dedicated Auto Mode. Advanced SR AUTO mode automatically selects optimum settings for 58 different scene types and AF modes. Beginners can use the rear Command Dial to select specific scene types.
And while it’s not ideal for serious photographers, it’s certainly a more capable option than a Sony A6400. The X-T30 II offers more features than its predecessor, including a silent mode.
The Sony X-T30 is a good alternative to the Sony A6400 and is lightweight. The Sony a6400 is about 20 grams heavier and is also slightly larger and shorter.
The Fujifilm X-T30 has a small, ergonomic grip and a weather-sealed body. Its kit lens is not weather-proof, so you’ll need to purchase a more expensive lens or buy a third-party lens.
The Fujifilm X-T30 II lacks the one-touch Movie Record button, but it has built-in wi-fi and Bluetooth, making it easy to use with a smartphone. It supports 2.4Ghz wi-fi and a Fujifilm app.
In addition to its Wi-Fi capability, the X-T30 II features an impressive 30fps shooting rate, full AF/AE metering, and blackout-free between-frames video. The X-T30 II has a guide number of five.
While the Sony a6400 is a reliable camera, it also has several annoying flaws. Its autofocus system is slower, but it shows lens movements in live view.
Its lens is also more expensive, so a Sony X-T30 alternative is a great option if you want to save some money. A 64GB SD card has more features than the X-T30.
The Fujifilm X-T30 II offers an extended ISO range of 80-51200. Its lens is capable of focusing on objects as close as -7EV.
Its NP-W126S Li-ion battery is also compatible with a USB Type-C port.
It can be recharged using an external power-bank. Its 26-megapixel Fine JPEG setting produces an average file size of 10Mb.
Sony a6400 Alternatives: Conclusion
Sony a6400 comes with a ton of features such as xxxx, but it lacks some advanced features that a professional photographer or filmmaker may need.
These features such as body stabilization, which is available in Sony a6500 is lacking in a6400. This might be one reason to switch to a different camera.
Keep in mind, though, that you can use a lens with OSS (Optical Steady Shot) to take care of body stabilization.
So there you have it, the alternative cameras to the Sony a6400.